Yes please thank you very much
Just bought a projector. Freakin' sweet.
Just bought a projector. Freakin' sweet.
Haha i bet the dam schools firewall and am now able to come on Something Emporium hahahahahahahahahahahahaha Go the free concert after the Marathon on Sunday ....
Don't you just love being 18 i mean i do yay yay yaaaaaaaaaay
heheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh
love you all
Alicia
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
The token black guy with a Kid 'n Play haircut to match, Jaws was never seen without his trusty compass & binoculars, but that doesn't help explain why he was named after a freaking shark. You could make the really obscure connection to his fondness of nature & the environment, but I'm pretty sure that sharks aren't an endangered species.And if that's a little low brow for you, here's (Boing :-() Quentin Tarantino's Republic Dogs. For those of you who don't know your classical philosophy, the following excerpt references the cave allegory, mixed in with The Symposium (starring Socrates, Alcibiades and Aristophanes). Also, Alcibiades really was a pussy.
Hang on a second... token black guy? Kid 'n Play haircut? Fondness of nature & the environment? There's something very familiar about all that. Now where have I seen someone fitting that description before?
Why, it's Kwame of the Planeteers! Holy crap, look at that. Kwame & Jaws even dress similarly. They're both wearing shirts with the planet Earth on them, & matching green tube socks! GREEN FREAKING TUBE SOCKS!
Socrates: Bingo. So you'd say this gimp, you'd say this gimp motherfucker would be unable to perceive true perfection -- but that don't mean it don't exist. Now if you brought him out of the cave, into the light, things would be less dark, and his eyes might heal a little, he might begin to see a glimmer of light, thereby gaining the idea of true perfection --
Aristotle: What kind of argument is that? Your theory of the forms rests on an arbitrary and vicious act of violence.
Socrates: [Draws his gun.] Aristotle, you're Plato's student, I respect you, but I will put fucking bullets through your heart if you don't take back what you said about me being violent now!
Aristotle: [Also drawing gun] You shoot, you'll be dining with Lord Hades tonight. I repeat. You kill me, your ass is eating pomegranite fucking casserole for the rest of eternity.
Alcibiades: Shit, man, you're acting like a bunch of fuckin' Spartans. Am I the only philosopher around here?
Socrates and Aristotle: [To Alcibiades] Shut up!
Alcibiades: Guys, guys, calm down. Look, I've got it. Let's have a symposium -- we can all drink wine and make speeches in praise of love.
Aristotle: What are you, some kind of pansy?
Socrates: Shoot that dipshit.
[Socrates and Aristotle turn in unison and shoot Alcibiades, then turn back and again aim at each other.]
var text = clipboardData.getData("Text");So what? It's not as if this data is going anywhere, right? Well, wrong. Thanks to XMLHttpRequest (the basis of AJAX) your clipboard contents could have been sitting in my email inbox by the time you started reading this news item. Luckily for you it's not ('View', 'Source' if you want to check), but not all websites will be that nice. So, what can you do? Well, you could make the change to Firefox, Opera or Safari. I have, and haven't looked back. Or you could disable Javascript - it'll break some sites, but it's pretty much the safest way to use IE. Or you could follow these steps to disable this particular 'feature':It's getting hard to be someone but it all works out.Also, have utter respect for:
It doesn't matter much to me.
Always[,] no [know] sometimes[,] think it's me,One of those songs you appreciate so much more after a few listens. And yes, I did hear the speed change one minute into the song. And the weird almost mispitching in John's voice. George Martin just makes me want to grab a four-track and start playing around with it.
but you know [no] I know [no] when it's a dream.
I think I [a?] know [no][,] I mean a 'yes', but it's all wrong.
That is, I think[,] I disagree.
This is still a website. I'm still here. I think we need a new poem. If there's anyone out there who is even remotely aware of this website and even more remotely poetic (really only first prerequisite matters, really, really) then e-mail me something to post up there. All submissions will be posted. That's right, anything, anonymity guaranteed, (if requested) and sure, if it's crap then it may happen to be posted and immediately purged, but it will be posted.There's also the issue of the other domain to be taken care of. I'm in such dire need of attention that I'll give you it as long as you're prepared to make some use of it. My suggestion is that you simply ruthlessly parody Trav. Right, time to celebrate. Justin, post about Sustainability Engineering - it's worth getting worked up about.
So, my ASUS motherboard crapped out last night, eight months after I bought it. It did a hard shutdown, accompanied by a bang (because it was plugged into my stereo) and now it refuses to start up. It even refuses to turn the power LED on!
I went and got my original invoice - remembering that there's a one year warranty on all the parts I bought. I was intrigued to find the following at the bottom of the invoice:
Now, I'm pretty interested by many of these clauses because of a little piece of law called the Consumer Guarantees Act, 1993. Basically, that's the Act which sets out 'the guarantees given ... to consumers upon the supply of goods or services; and the rights of redress against suppliers and manufacturers in respect of any failure of goods or services to comply with any such guarantees'. The really great thing about this Act is that if you're not buying for a business 'the provisions of [it] shall have effect notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in any agreement.'
It doesn't really matter what terms a retailer sets out in their warranty terms - you still have the rights of the Act behind you; the only thing a warranty can do is increase those rights.
So, my specific concerns with the warranty terms? First up, a retailer is not allowed to get you to take up concerns with a manufacturer. It's almost always up to your own discretion whether you wish to take up a claim with the retailer or directly with the manufacturer. The only time when this isn't the case is when the manufacturer has made claims that were false, and those claims didn't appear on the packaging (where the retailer would be aware of them).
Next, a retailer is responsible for a delay in providing a remedy. If your problem is serious (as mine is), or if there's an unreasonable delay you can ask for your money back directly (which the warranty terms don't mention), insist on a replacement not a repair, or even take your goods somewhere else to be repaired and charge the retailer.
Under no circumstances can the retailer charge you for freight if you've returned it to them instead of the manufacturer. As soon as you've got it to the retailer it's up to them to deal with the problem. If you pay them freight to get the good to the manufacturer you're actually getting them to provide a service!
The company above may be able to get out of their warranty if your part has lost its serial number or identification tag, but they can't get out of their obligations to the Act. The Act makes it clear that if you haven't used the goods incorrectly and they've proven themselves to be of unacceptable quality, you have the right to a remedy. It doesn't matter that you can't read the serial number any more.
From the 8th April 2003, the Act also covers the sale of software. The unspecified 'copyright issues' specified in the warranty have absolutely no bearing on your right to a remedy if your software is not of acceptable quality. This is something Dick Smith Electronics are also guilty of - while it's not something their legal team would endorse, I'm sure, you often see signs proclaiming software cannot be returned. Even if the Act didn't exist, there would be something really, really, really stupid behind this: it's not detrimental to the stores interest if someone might have done something illegal with (copied) some software and then returned it to the store. What they're really doing is using the spectre of copyright infringement to try to prevent fraud. And all this while there's other people using the spectre of terrorism to try to prevent copyright infringement. The world really sucks sometimes.
So, to wrap up, don't look at your warranty statement - look at the Consumer Guarantees Act. Finally, in some cases traders may actually be much more liable if they write stupid warranty statements like this; the Ministry of Consumer Affairs says they may be breaching the Fair Trading Act by misleading you about your legal rights. Shop smart y'all.
